Trademarks, the First Amendment, and the Implications of the Supreme Court's Brunetti Decision

Home
»
Intellectual Property Law
»
Product Details

You must select a location to proceed.

Yes

There was a problem adding this course to your account. Please try again in a few minutes. If the problem persists, you can contact our support department at (877) 880-1335.

Adding Registration, Please wait...

You must be logged in to perform this action.

Cancel

Trademarks, the First Amendment, and the Implications of the Supreme Court's Brunetti Decision

Intellectual Property Law, Trademark Interest Group

Credit(s):

1 Participatory MCLE Credits

Course Number:

IP_08-06-19

Original Program Date:

August 6, 2019

Duration:

59 minutes

Access:

Available for 3 months after Registration

Passport:

This product is Passport Eligible

Facebook

Twitter

E-Mail

Description
Sessions
Credits
Faculty
Materials
Reviews
Dates and Locations
Pricing

Category: Intellectual Property Law

Category: Intellectual Property Law (show less)

The speaker will discuss the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in Iancu v. Brunetti, where the Court held that the federal trademark law banning registration of immoral and scandalous marks is a viewpoint-discriminatory regulation of expression that violates the First Amendment. This conclusion was not surprising given the fact that the Court held in 2017 in Matal v. Tam that a similar law denying registration to potentially disparaging marks was an unconstitutional regulation of the viewpoint of expression. While some commentators believe that Tam and Brunetti require the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to register expression that is hateful, profane, vulgar, or otherwise offensive, trademark applicants still need to prove that their marks are distinctive and function as trademarks that identify a single source of goods or services. Thus, such marks may be refused registration on lack of distinctiveness or failure to function grounds. Moreover, the Justices suggested that Congress could draft a more narrow provision that would survive First Amendment scrutiny, such as a law banning registration of expression that is obscene, vulgar, or profane.

Tam and Brunetti are also important decisions for other reasons. In both of these cases, the Supreme Court clarified that trademark laws regulate the content (and sometimes the viewpoint) of expression and are not immune from careful First Amendment scrutiny. Thus the Justices opened the door to wide-ranging free speech challenges to other U.S. trademark laws. Trademark laws that facilitate the communication of source-identifying product information, promote competition, and protect consumers from misleading uses of marks are probably constitutional under the First Amendment. Yet some trademark laws—such as dilution law—are likely to be found unconstitutional if they are subject to First Amendment analysis, and may need to be eliminated or revised to better protect expressive values and further the goals of trademark law.

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

(CLEtoGo (Podcasts))
Solo & Small Firm Summit: Legal Ethics & Privacy, Protecting Your Clients and Your Office

(OnDemand)
2019 IP Institute: Trademark - How to Best Utilize TESS for Trademark Clearance and Prosecution

(OnDemand)
2019 IP Institute: Licensing - What are the Key Terms of a License Agreement?

(OnDemand)
Statutes and Street Art: Where Copyright Protection for Murals and Street Art Meet the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act (AWCPA)

(OnDemand)
Understanding the Music Modernization Act: From New Licensing Rules to CLASSICS Act Protections

(OnDemand)
2018 IP Institute: Online Brand Monitoring and Enforcement – Winning the Battle Without Losing the War

(OnDemand)
2018 IP Institute: Substance Abuse in the Legal Profession: Prevention, Detection, and Treatment

(OnDemand)
2019 Trademark Office Comes to California: TTAB Updates and Practice Tips

(OnDemand)
Anti-Viral: Reporting IP Infringement on Social Media

(OnDemand)
2019 IP and the Internet Conference: Social Media Influencers as a Practice

(OnDemand)
36th Annual Labor and Employment Law Section Annual Meeting: Supporting Transgender Employees: Legal Update and Practical Guidance for Creating Inclusive Workplaces

(OnDemand)
Mediation as an Effective Tool in Resolving IP Disputes