Letting Go Can Be Hard to Do – the Current State of Non-Consensual Third Party Releases in Chapter 11 Cases

Home
»
Business Law
»
Product Details

You must select a location to proceed.

Yes

There was a problem adding this course to your account. Please try again in a few minutes. If the problem persists, you can contact our support department at (877) 880-1335.

Adding Registration, Please wait...

You must be logged in to perform this action.

Cancel

Letting Go Can Be Hard to Do – the Current State of Non-Consensual Third Party Releases in Chapter 11 Cases

Business Law Section

Credit(s):

1.25 Legal Specialization in Bankruptcy Law
1.25 Participatory MCLE Credits

Course Number:

BL_06-22-22

Original Program Date:

June 22, 0222

Duration:

1 hour 12 minutes

Access:

Available for 3 months after Registration

Passport:

This product is Passport Eligible

Facebook

Twitter

E-Mail

Description
Sessions
Credits
Faculty
Materials
Reviews
Dates and Locations

Category: Business Law

Category: Business Law (show less)

Non-consensual third-party releases in Chapter 11 plans (in which parties that have not filed bankruptcy nevertheless benefit from broad release provisions that are included in the Chapter 11 plans) have been a controversial topic in business bankruptcy cases for many years.

Some courts, such as the Ninth Circuit, have previously held that such releases are impermissible. Others, such as the Second and Third Circuits, have permitted them in various circumstances.

There has been a bevy of recent decisions on this topic (as well as on exculpation clauses) recently. These include the blockbuster Purdue Pharma case in New York (which held that there is no statutory basis for non-consensual third party releases) to the Ninth Circuit’s Blixseth case (which held that Section 524(e) of the Bankruptcy Code did not bar a narrow exculpation clause).

Among the cases we will discuss are In re Purdue Pharma, L.P. (S.D.N.Y.), In re Mahwah Bergen Retail Group, Inc. (f/k/a Ascena Retail Group, Inc.) (E.D. Va.), Blixeth v. Credit Suisse (9^th Circuit), and In re Astria Health (Bankr. E.D. Wash.).

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

(OnDemand)
Best Practices for Successful Client Relations

(CLEtoGo (Podcasts))
Building Persuasive Damages Models for Business Cases and Related Contract Drafting Tips

(OnDemand)
Default Interest Considerations in Bankruptcy

(CLEtoGo (Podcasts))
Considerations in Winding Up a Small Business

(Self Study Articles)
Ethics of Social Media for Lawyers: Where Stunting for the Gram Meets Losing Your Bar Card

(OnDemand)
Insurance and Covid19: An Update for Franchisees, Franchisors and Other Businesses

(Self Study Articles)
Threats, Extortion and Legitimate Advocacy

(OnDemand)
5 Positive Psychology Activities to Cultivate Resilience & Preserve Mental Health During the Pandemic

(Self Study Articles)
Owning and Occupying Commercial Office Buildings Amidst a Shifting Pandemic Landscape: A Framework to Understand and Mitigate Premises Liability for Owners and Occupiers

(CLEtoGo (Podcasts))
Subordination and Recharacterization of Claims in Bankruptcy

(OnDemand)
The world has changed. Let’s sort it out

(OnDemand)
2021 Solo & Small Firm Summit: Make Better Decisions: Understanding Implicit Bias, Micro-messaging & De-Biasing Strategies